The sen- tences for these officials might have included public apologies or reparations to locate missing persons. At the same time, the successes of the CRPs suggest that these approaches might have been pursued simul- taneously. In any case, a more inclusive design process might have ensured a victim-directed reconciliation process. In Cambodia, similarly, the hybrid tribunal might have incorporated local moral authority, such as Buddhist principles, into its design. Perhaps this would have led to a mechanism more akin to mediation than litigation, or to simplified and more accessible structures and proceedings. Sentencing might have in- cluded public confession and apology. It is also possible that a pluralist process approach would have pointed to transitional justice mechanisms entirely outside the current menu of options.