h the past fifteen years there has been an outpouring of research on the role of emotions in virtually all of the disciplines, with philosophy, sociology, psychology, history, and anthropology taking the lead. In philosophical investigations of emo-tion, for example, many have argued against the conventional Western association of the emotions with irrationality (and with women] and have insisted that the emotions have a cognitive dimension and thus are not opposed to reason.’ Sociolo-gists have investigated the kind of “emotion work” that is required to be performed in everyday life.2 Psychologists have explored the psychological and physiological mechanisms associated with the experience of feeling3 Historians have begun the work of tracing how the emotions change over time in terms of the value they are accorded by a given society, showing that certain emotions are fostered by the twentieth-century consumer society at the expense of other emotion^.^ And anthro-pologists have studied the ways in which the emotions are practiced differently across cultures, with research often focusing on specific emotions or feeling states - shame, anger, and depression, among them.’; In education, the emotions associated with learning and teaching are by no means new terrain for researchers and educators, but there seems to be a renewed interest especially in the emotions of teaching, the emotional politics of teacher development and educational reform, and their implications for teacher education.6 However, most of this research (with a few exceptions) places emphasis on the role of interpersonal relations of teachers from within a strong social constructionist position. A hfferent perspective can be found in exploring the role of the discursive structures and normative practices through which teaching is figured and practiced.
النتائج (
العربية) 1:
[نسخ]نسخ!
h the past fifteen years there has been an outpouring of research on the role of <br>emotions in virtually all of the disciplines, with philosophy, sociology, psychology, <br>history, and anthropology taking the lead. In philosophical investigations of emo-<br>tion, for example, many have argued against the conventional Western association <br>of the emotions with irrationality (and with women] and have insisted that the <br>emotions have a cognitive dimension and thus are not opposed to reason.’ Sociolo-<br>gists have investigated the kind of “emotion work” that is required to be performed <br>in everyday life.2 Psychologists have explored the psychological and physiological <br>mechanisms associated with the experience of feeling3 Historians have begun the <br>work of tracing how the emotions change over time in terms of the value they are <br>accorded by a given society, showing that certain emotions are fostered by the <br>twentieth-century consumer society at the expense of other emotion^.^ And anthro-<br>pologists have studied the ways in which the emotions are practiced differently <br>across cultures, with research often focusing on specific emotions or feeling states <br>- shame, anger, and depression, among them.’; <br>In education, the emotions associated with learning and teaching are by no <br>means new terrain for researchers and educators, but there seems to be a renewed <br>interest especially in the emotions of teaching, the emotional politics of teacher <br>تطوير وإصلاح التعليم، وآثارها على education.6 المعلم <br>ومع ذلك، فإن معظم هذا البحث (مع بعض الاستثناءات) يشدد على دور <br>العلاقات الشخصية للمعلمين من داخل بنائي اجتماعي قوي <br>الموقف. منظور hfferent يمكن العثور عليها في استكشاف دور الخطابية <br>الهياكل والممارسات المعيارية التي يتم من خلالها برزت التدريس وممارستها.
يجري ترجمتها، يرجى الانتظار ..
