INTRODUCTION
We usually think of lame ducks as politicians who have lost influence to their successors, but the next president could enter office with his or her influence already lost to his or her predecessors. The growing revenues that accompany economic growth traditionally provide a way for government to address new needs and priorities. But because of the increasing dominance of autopilot programs with built-in growth, all those revenues plus additional borrowing are required to pay for health and retirement expenses and interest on the debt.
Hillary Clinton’s and Donald Trump’s campaign promises differ significantly, but, with the exception of Trump’s tax cut and the associated rise in interest costs, neither would do much to change the overall composition of the budget or create the flexibility to address future needs related to young people, workers, defense, infrastructure, and basic government functions. Without changes to restore flexibility, the next president will find himself or herself presiding over budgets dictated almost entirely by previous presidents and Congresses.
Thus, rather than painting their own ambitious agenda for the future, both candidates have implicitly endorsed and prioritized a preordained path. The new spending initiatives the candidates are calling for are relatively small.
By allowing autopilot programs to continue to grow rapidly, the candidates support a growing long-term national debt (a much more rapidly growing one in Trump’s case because he also proposes large tax cuts) and federal spending that largely represents the status quo.
HOW SPENDING INCREASES OUTPACE REVENUE
Under current law, revenues are expected to rise almost $850 billion annually by 2026 compared with 2016 (adjusted for inflation) because of a growing economy and population. As a share of the economy, revenue collection will grow from 17.8 percent of GDP today to 18.5 percent by 2026.
However, inflation-adjusted spending is projected to grow $1.28 trillion in 2026 relative to 2016 because of increasing health, retirement, and interest expenses. In other words, 150 percent of new revenue a decade from now is precommitted to spending growth scheduled under current law.
النتائج (
العربية) 1:
[نسخ]نسخ!
INTRODUCTIONWe usually think of lame ducks as politicians who have lost influence to their successors, but the next president could enter office with his or her influence already lost to his or her predecessors. The growing revenues that accompany economic growth traditionally provide a way for government to address new needs and priorities. But because of the increasing dominance of autopilot programs with built-in growth, all those revenues plus additional borrowing are required to pay for health and retirement expenses and interest on the debt.Hillary Clinton’s and Donald Trump’s campaign promises differ significantly, but, with the exception of Trump’s tax cut and the associated rise in interest costs, neither would do much to change the overall composition of the budget or create the flexibility to address future needs related to young people, workers, defense, infrastructure, and basic government functions. Without changes to restore flexibility, the next president will find himself or herself presiding over budgets dictated almost entirely by previous presidents and Congresses.Thus, rather than painting their own ambitious agenda for the future, both candidates have implicitly endorsed and prioritized a preordained path. The new spending initiatives the candidates are calling for are relatively small.قبل السماح بالبرامج الطيار الآلي لمواصلة النمو السريع، دعم المرشحين تزايد ديون الوطنية الطويلة الأجل (تخفيضات كثير تنمو بسرعة أكثر واحد في حالة ترامب نظراً لأنه يقترح أيضا ضريبة كبيرة) والإنفاق الفيدرالي التي إلى حد كبير ويمثل الوضع الراهن.كيف تفوق الزيادات في الإنفاق الإيراداتوبموجب القانون الحالي، المتوقع أن يرتفع سنوياً تقريبا $ 850 بیلیون 2026 مقارنة مع عام 2016 (المعدل للتضخم) إيرادات بسبب تنامي الاقتصاد والسكان. كحصة من الاقتصاد، تحصيل الإيرادات سوف تنمو من 17.8 في المائة من الناتج المحلي الإجمالي اليوم إلى 18.5 في المائة من 2026.ومع ذلك، المعدلة حسب التضخم الإنفاق من المتوقع أن ينمو مبلغ 1.28 تريليون في 2026 بالنسبة إلى عام 2016 بسبب زيادة الصحة والتقاعد ونفقات الفائدة. وبعبارة أخرى، عقد من الآن بريكوميتيد للمقرر بموجب القانون الحالي نمو الإنفاق 150 في المائة إيرادات جديدة.
يجري ترجمتها، يرجى الانتظار ..
